Local Government Information

2005 Arizona State Senate
2005 Arizona State House of Representatives
How a bill becomes a law  -  Grass Roots Strategies
Basic Pilot Program Info  -  Governor's Drought Task Force

 

Recent Research/Analysis of ADWR Water Allotments Study

Please link into: http://cals.arizona.edu/turf/ADWR_brown_az1381.pdf for Dr. Brown's recent research/analysis of the ADWR water allotments as he studied it the last several years in Tucson.  The "conclusion" section is on the last page and shows that we are effectively operating in a deficit per the current allotment as the salt loads continue to increase and rainfall decreases.  This is information being collected for the 4th water management plan although still needs to be emphasized.

Arizona Drought Task Force

Governor Napolitano signed Executive Order 2003-12, establishing the Arizona Drought Task Force, on March 20, 2003. The Governor directed the Department of Water Resources to provide leadership in this effort. The Task Force itself is comprised of state agencies and elected officials; however, representatives of Arizona counties, cities, towns, Indian tribes, water and power utilities and the public are invited to participate.

The Executive Order requires that a short-term drought plan be prepared to respond to potable water needs, as well as non-potable needs for agricultural operations, wildlife and wildfire this summer. The short time frame available to develop this plan requires that we depend heavily on previous drought planning efforts, and that we move quickly to establish priorities and implementation strategies. The Order also requires that we develop a long-term, comprehensive plan that will provide for drought planning efforts throughout the state and a coordinated response framework. This longer-term effort is intended to recognize and build upon existing drought efforts, and reduce the impact of drought on economic activities, communities and habitat throughout the state. The final major assignment is the development of a conservation strategy that focuses on education, technology transfer and assistance.

If you would like to participate in Drought Task Force activities, please send the name and email address of the person you would like us to notify to, dtf@adwr.state.az.us
There will be multiple opportunities to provide input to the process. If you have a comment or suggestion, or would like to offer particular expertise to assist us, please send us an email address at the address above. Thanks for your interest

New ADA rules make few demands
By Bradley Klein

The updated guidelines to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act will not substantially alter how golf courses are built or how the game is played. The final rules issued Sept. 3 by the U.S. Department of Justice culminate a nine-year process of review and commentary that included detailed input by golf course industry personnel as well as extensive public hearings across the country.

Of particular note is no mention of requiring golf course operators to provide for rent single-rider golf cars specially designed for disabled golfers. Concerns by the department’s Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) were focused entirely on design and architecture. Operational rules, such as mandated provision of golf cars equipped to assist special physical needs, have been left to the Department of Justice for possible future action.

Among the major determinations of the modified rules:

  • Courses must provide a continuous (unpaved), 4-foot-wide line of access throughout the grounds.

  • All putting surfaces must be accessible, but not necessarily bunkers.

  • Every tee does not need to be available to the handicapped. For example, one of two teeing grounds per hole should be, and two tees if there are three or more. In all cases, the forward tee should be accessible, except if renovations on existing courses would require major terrain alteration.

“The revised standards for golf courses are not at all onerous for golf course operators,” said Gary Robb, a member of the Access Board and executive director of the National Center on Accessibility, a public service training and research institute based at Indiana University. “The standards assume that people with mobility impairments are going to be using an assistive device, perhaps a single-rider vehicle. The golf course rules are probably the least imposing of all guidelines for all recreational facilities.”

The Access Board also relaxed a number of design criteria with respect to the slope of approach to teeing grounds. It also provided more precise criteria for access to shelters and paved cart paths. Along the way, it affirmed its intent to make the game more available to the estimated 52.5 million disabled Americans without substantially changing the challenge and character of golf course design.

Much of the rule-making is based upon the already widespread use of golf cars. As a summary statement of the guidelines makes clear, “golf car passages are permitted in lieu of accessible routes throughout the golf courses. To comply, courses must be designed so golf cars can access teeing grounds and putting greens.” Rather than insist on access to all features via wheelchair, the Access Board took a more relaxed approach and stated disabled golfers should be able to go anywhere golf cars are able to go.

The final accessibility guidelines for recreation facilities apply to golf courses, driving ranges, practice putting greens, and practice teeing grounds “that are newly designed . . . and to existing facilities when they are altered.” In the case of any renovations to established courses, the guidelines apply only to the renovated components and not to the entire facility. If a 50-year-old golf course rebuilds two greens and two sets of tees, those features alone must be in compliance. All public access facilities, including resorts and daily-fee courses, must comply. The guidelines also pertain to privately operated, member-only facilities that host outside functions.

Denver-based course designer Richard Phelps chaired the American Society of Golf Course Architects committee on the ADA and was among the industry representatives who participated in the Access Board’s deliberations since 1993. He lauds the way the federal government worked closely with experts, the public and the private sectors in refining the regulations.

“We wanted to stay involved to make sure the results were doable without ruining the game,” Phelps said.

The guidelines acknowledge the “unpredictability of where the ball lands” and that mandating accessibility of every feature “would require altering slopes and eliminate some of the challenge” inherent in golf. While requiring that accessible elements of the facility include golf car rental area, bag drop, practice green, practice range, and on course toilets and shelters, it shied away from mandating handrails on paths, since this would create a secondary danger of ricocheting golf balls on in-play areas.

Among the technical requirements were that 5 percent of all teeing stages on a practice range be accessible to disabled players. Curbed cart paths must offer exit/access points of at last 60 inches wide at intervals of at least every 75 yards. Previously announced technical specifications with respect to the area of the teeing ground and the need to establish a 1:48 (just over 2 percent) slope leading to and from the tee were abandoned.

One area of concern to the golf industry reserved for possible future review by the Access Board involves the use of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers on golf courses. Because people suffering multiple chemical sensitivities might qualify under the ADA for protection, the Access Board “plans to closely examine the needs of this population, and undertake activities that address accessibility.”

Bradley S. Klein is editor of Golfweek’s Superintendent News.
To reach him e-mail bklein@golfweek.com.

 

Return to top of page